Page uses Atkinson Hyperlegible font from Braille Institute
Contact:
[email protected] 
Election System Costs
Contents:
Report on costs for all makers of election equipment in the US: Price of
Voting, 2021 
Report on
structure of the election equipment industry in the US: Business
of Voting, 2017
Large collection
of contracts from 40 states 1992-2008 for
election equipment & support, collected by Dr. Joseph Lorenzo Hall with Table of
Contents by county, date & vendor, and Readme.
A few
more 1998-2022
| Costs to reanalyze BALLOT IMAGES Independent software to tally
  ballot images is available from: 
 ·       
  Trachtenberg, Mitch (2013) Democracy Counts now used at https://electionstransparencyproject.com/news/
  Free under open source license. It reads HART
  Intercivic ballot formats in Humboldt County, CA, and would need a skilled
  programmer to generalize it. 
 | ||||||
| updated 12/7/2022 | Contract Cost per Election (excludes
  government staff cost) | Number of ballot sheets in
  elections shown | Cost per ballot sheet | Sources. The numbers are also in a spreadsheet. | ||
| AuditEngine | ||||||
| Published Prices |  | |||||
| Analyze ballot images | $ 5,000 | 25,000 | $0.20 | $5k analysis includes first 25k sheets. Extra sheets at $0.07 per sheet.
  https://auditengine.org/price/  $5k analysis plus $5k re-scan includes first 10k sheets. Extra sheets
  at $0.22 per sheet ($0.07 plus $0.15) | ||
| Re-scan & analyze | $ 10,000 | 10,000 | $1.00 | |||
| Clear Ballot,
  sole source contracts to analyze existing ballot images on contractor's
  equipment; no fresh scan | ||||||
| Maryland | Maryland
  2019-2022 Scope
  of Work, "cost
  of the audit does not increase based on the number of ballots" Costs: pp.158-59 of bpw.maryland.gov/MeetingDocs/2020-Dec-02-Agenda.pdf Sole source justification and price analysis required by BPW Number of
  ballots: elections.maryland.gov/elections/2020/index.html
   2022 ballots
  based on 2018, since only 2% total population growth in 4 years https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MDPOP Reports: https://maryland.clearballot.com/  As is, no
  warranty of accurate results; Clear Ballot shows discrepancies on individual ballots;
  provides portal for county to adjudicate ballot interpretations. State or
  counties provide pdf of each ballot style & full results, images &
  CVRs. | |||||
| 2020 special primary | $ 45,063 | 84,298 | $0.53 | |||
| 2020 special general | $ 45,063 | 151,718 | $0.30 | |||
| 2022 primary | $ 435,050 | 872,305 | $0.50 | |||
| 2020 primary | $ 395,500 | 1,763,281 | $0.22 | |||
| 2022 general | $ 435,050 | 2,335,248 | $0.19 | |||
| 2020 general | $ 395,500 | 3,037,030 | $0.13 | |||
| 2020-2022 totals | $1,751,226 | 8,243,880 | $0.21 | |||
| Maryland 2016 estimate |  |  | $0.09 | |||
| Colorado, Montrose County 2020
  general  |  | |||||
| Base Fee (in addition to per-ballot fee) | $ 12,200 | 25,160 | $0.48 | Source: “Results Verification
  2021.09.27” As is, no warranty of accurate results; Clear Ballot shows
  discrepancies on individual ballots; provides portal for county to adjudicate
  ballot interpretations; helpdesk during elections 7-11, unlimited support;
  always phone & email response within 24h; no "worker without
  authorization"; Colorado can inspect onsite. County provides pdf of each
  ballot style & full results, images & CVRs. | ||
| Fee based on number of ballots | $ 6,290 | 25,160 | $0.25 | |||
| Total | $ 18,490 | 25,160 | $0.73 | |||
| Clear Ballot, sole source contracts
  to buy equipment to re-scan & analyze | ||||||
| New York, pricing
  for 100,000 registered voters |  | |||||
| 1st year: Buy 2 small
  scanner packages & server & 2 days training, assume 12 year life, 24
  elections (3 Presidential elections) | $ 56,900 | 1,200,000 total 12 years, 24 elections, 50% avg turnout | $0.09 | 2021-2026 online.ogs.ny.gov/purchase/spg/pdfdocs/2230023198PL_ClearBallot.xlsx and online.ogs.ny.gov/purchase/spg/pdfdocs/2230023198Contractorinfo.pdf
  and online.ogs.ny.gov/purchase/spg/awards/2230023198CAN.HTM
   Note: Costs per
  ballot drop with more ballots.  Details are in
  the spreadsheet. Terms:p.31:
  Five sets of manuals, not confidential; 5-year guarantee. P.35 NY gets access
  to security logs upon request. Pp.28-29 require onsite support within 24
  hours of call & equipment replacement if needed in 48 hours, from 30 days
  before to 15 days after election day. P33. Notify security incidents within
  48h, data breaches ASAP within 24h. | ||
| Later year: support, license,
  warranty & 2 days training | $ 67,260 | |||||
| Total 12 years | $ 796,760 | 1,200,000 | $0.33 | |||
| 12 yrs non-variable costs
  (mostly license) | $ 215,960 |  |  | |||
| Varying cost per ballot | $ 0.24 |  |  | |||
| Florida, Miami-Dade  |  | |||||
| Buy 1 server, 16 scanners
  & 10 days training, assume 12 year life (3 Presidential elections) | $879,387 | 8,790,828 total 12 years | $0.10 | Costs: http://votewell.net/miami2022cost.pdf Contract: http://votewell.net/miami2022terms.pdf
  As is, no warranty of accurate results; Clear Ballot can audit Miami's
  facilities with "reasonable advance notice" Details are in
  the spreadsheet. | ||
| Annual maintenance/year (free
  1st yr) | $163,536 | |||||
| Total 12 years | $2,678,283 | 8,790,828 | $0.30 | |||
| Florida, Lake County | May 2022 Clear Ballot contract
  without cost pages: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24630454-cb-lake2022
  has clause letting Clear Ballot company conduct audits of Lake County for
  compliance, not vice versa (which is probably covered in state law). All
  products are as is, without warranty or liability: 5. DISCLAIMERS Except as specifically provided in this
  agreement, to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, the Clear
  Ballot products are provided to customer “as is” with all faults, and without
  warranty of any kind. To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law,
  Clear Ballot expressly disclaims all warranties, express, implied or
  statutory, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of
  merchantability, quality of information, quiet enjoyment, and fitness for a
  particular purpose. Clear Ballot does not warrant that the Clear Ballot
  products will meet customer's requirements or that the operation of the Clear
  Ballot products will be uninterrupted or error-free. Clear Ballot does not
  warrant or make any representation regarding the use or the results of the
  use of the Clear Ballot products in teams of their correctness, accuracy,
  quality, reliability, appropriateness for a particular task or application or
  otherwise. No oral or written information or advice given by Clear Ballot or
  Clear Ballot’s authorized representatives shall create a warranty or in any
  way increase the scope of the warranties provided in this agreement (if
  any)... 8. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY AND ACTIONS To the maximum extent permitted by
  applicable law, neither party will be liable to the other for special
  indirect, incidental, consequential or exemplary damages, including without
  limitation loss of profit and costs, loss of business, loss of savings, loss
  of data, or loss of goodwill in connection with the performance of the Clear
  Ballot products, or the performance of any other obligations under this
  agreement, even if it is aware of the possibility of the occurrence of such
  damages... The limitations of liability set forth herein shall not apply to
  any claim or damage for which liability cannot be excluded by law... | |||||
| RISK-LIMITING AUDITS | ||||||
| Arlo software is freely available, open source, to run on customer computers
  without support. Following contracts are for support and running on
  VotingWorks computers, online. | https://docs.voting.works/arlo  Comments & questions on Arlo
  2022-07-11 http://votewell.net/ArloRLATransparency.pdf
   | |||||
| Arlo for
  California: contract for support to counties for
  11 months, for as many contests & ballots as the counties wish. Counties
  do their own data entry: | ||||||
| Implementation of Arlo online | $22,894 | http://votewell.net/arloca.pdf 58
  counties, 21,885,545 registered voters 9/9/22, so $0.0010/registered voter Contract
  requires monthly vulnerability
  assessments (though only 2 audits/year), remediate in 5 days, inspect with
  "advance written request", encryption, CA
  & "industry
  standards and guidelines", "allow the State reasonable access to
  security logs, latency statistics, and other related security data",
  user acceptance testing.  | ||||
| Custom Development for CA | $1,221 |  | ||||
| Training | $91,572 |  | ||||
| Total | $115,687 |  | ||||
| Arlo for Georgia: contract to support to state & counties for 12 months. Counties do
  their own data entry. | ||||||
| Software hosting & support | $54,258 ($0.0075/registered voter) | http://votewell.net/arloga.pdf 159
  counties, 7,234,431 registered voters Contract shows
  price breakdown: $500 per training webinar, $1,500 per staff day of phone
  & email support, $2,500 per staff day onsite support https://coaltionforgoodgovernance.sharefile.com/d-s5ef43560ff7c4ac9911004ba8765501c Has audit instructions on pp.18-27 & 74; training
  slides on pp.29-72; critiques on pp.3-13, 79-81, 83-85. | ||||
| Custom Development for GA | $15,000 | |||||
| Training | $4,000 | |||||
| Support: phone, email & onsite | $94,500 | |||||
| Total | $167,758 | |||||
| Arlo for
  Pennsylvania: contract to support to state &
  counties for 12 months. Counties do their own data entry.  | ||||||
| Software hosting | $70,390 | http://votewell.net/arlopa.pdf 67
  counties, 8,872,968 registered voters, so $0.0079/registered voter Contract
  requires annual 3rd party vulnerability assessment, SOC
  reports & corrective action plan 1½ months after findings (timing
  relative to audits not set), allows state inspections "within at least
  three (3) business days' notice" (PA precedent may clarify whether this
  means more or less than 3 days notice), encryption, "industry
  standards", "best practices", background checks; also
  addresses liability. Chain of custody assessed in Bucks, Chester, Delaware,
  Lancaster, Montgomery, Philadelphia. Contract provides sample selection &
  expansion, though policy
  is to use existing sample & no expansion | ||||
| Training & support | $26,500 | |||||
| Assess chain of custody & VBM | $45,000 | |||||
| Total | $141,890 | |||||
| Arlo for Virginia:
  contract to support to state &
  counties for 12 months. Counties do their own data entry.  | ||||||
| Software hosting & support | $45,387 ($0.0075/registered voter) | http://votewell.net/arlova.pdf 133
  counties & independent cities, 6,051,629 registered voters Virginia did not
  provide any documents describing the "Added security requirements",
  saying they were "Vendor proprietary
  information" | ||||
| Added security requirements | $15,000 | |||||
| 3-month extension | $11,347 | |||||
| Total per year | $60,387 | |||||
| HAND COUNTS | ||||||
| Staff
  Minutes per Contest | Number of
  Ballots, 10 Contests per Ballot | Number of
  Staff Assigned | Elapsed
  Hours | Sources at  https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Time_for_hand_counts.png
   Tally sheet designs are at http://www.votewell.net/tally.htm
   | ||
| 0.10 | 100,000 | 60 | 28 | |||
| 0.33 | 100,000 | 180 | 31 | |||
| 1.00 | 100,000 | 300 | 56 | |||
